Showing posts with label Nutrition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nutrition. Show all posts

Monday, 12 September 2011

Better food choices start at home


Can a cozy dining table and nice music prompt people to reach for the greens and go light on dessert? 

So suggests a new study probing why people tend to eat more-nutritious meals at home than away from home. The findings, based on data from 160 women who reported their emotional states before and after meals, add to mounting evidence that psychological factors may help override humans’ wired-in preference for high-fat, sugary foods.

“Over the course of evolution in a world of food scarcity, humans and animals alike have been biologically programmed to elicit more powerful food reward responses to high-caloric foods” than to less-fattening fare, the study notes. Given those hard-wired urges, it may not be enough to understand that broccoli is better for the waistline than French fries. Home is known to be where people feel most content, and the positive emotions often associated with home-cooked meals may be part of the recipe for a healthy diet, the researchers indicate.

The findings, published in the July issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, suggest that people who are in a good mood at home tend to prepare healthier meals – and feel more emotionally rewarded after eating them. That cycle of positive reinforcement was more pronounced at home than elsewhere.
  
The report, by Prof. Ji Lu of Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Catherine Huet, and Prof.. Laurette Dubé of McGill University’s Desautels Faculty of Management, concludes that “the home is a privileged environment that nurtures healthy eating and in which healthier food choices trigger and are triggered by more positive emotions.”

This pattern may help explain why people make better choices at home than when eating out, says Prof. Dubé, senior author of the study and scientific director of the McGill World Platform for Health and Economic Convergence.

One limitation of the study is that all 160 participants were non-obese, white English-speaking women. Samples that vary in sex and culture, as well as samples that include children and obese populations, will be needed to demonstrate the extent to which the results can be generalized, the authors caution.

Even so, the findings provide insights that point toward novel strategies to encourage healthy eating, they conclude. Such strategies could rely on factors such as “interpersonal communications, home design and atmospheric cues” including “music, dining landscape, and kitchen equipment, which have all been found to induce positive emotions in both everyday and laboratory contexts.”

Tuesday, 10 May 2011

The sugar debate rages on

A sweet treat or pure poison? It seems like every expert is now weighing in on the topic of whether sugar and its substitutes are just mildly unhealthy or extremely toxic to the body.

The YouTube viral video that thrust the issue into the limelight in 2009 (a lecture by professor Robert H. Lustig, watch it here) has now had over a million views, and the issue has been gaining momentum, with researches across north America now discussing what Lustig calls “the most demonized additive known to man.”

Sugar and its derivative, high-fructose corn syrup, have been widely blamed for the skyrocketing number of diabetes and obesity cases in North America over the past decade, and now it is the suspected cause of other diseases such as heart disease and many common cancers. Some critics, however, argue that evidence is not yet solid enough to scapegoat the sweet stuff.

Here, we've rounded up some of the most recent articles on the topic - take a look and decide for yourself...

AP: Schools to ban chocolate milk May 2011 
Vancouver sun: Soda-Tax debate May 2011
Fox News: Is sugar poison? May 2011
New York Times: Is Sugar Toxic? April 2011
CBS: Can Sugar be Poisonous? April 2011 

Also, check out this excellent TED talk on kids and sugar from celebrity chef Jamie Oliver: